Morally Wrong To Commit Suicide?

Mor on the wholey Wrong To Commit Suicide?When asking ourselves whether it is goodly permissible to commit suicide, we essential first define suicide. There be triple types of suicide, firstly completeingly endangering bingles touch. Secondly the act of intention all toldy terminating ones conduct, and at last intentionally bringing near ones close, either by actively terminating ones life, or by non taking the necessary steps to preserve it. This leave alone thusly mean that sometimes we whitethorn find suicide chastely permissible or impermissible, however it quarter become circumstantial depending on which type of suicide is macrocosm carried out. Many of us restrain pre-conceived ideas around suicide and its permissibility. This is sometimes due to religion, law, or perhaps notwithstanding the charge it is portrayed in the media. We here about stories often but we must take into account that the majority of us will never know what it feels like to want to e nd our lives. It and so makes it hard for us to attend to this question immediately.I will be arguing whether we as exclusives wee-wee the moral obligation to commit suicide and the effects it will have upon both ourselves and early(a)s. I will be achieving this by examining both consequentiality and deontological theories. impertinent factors and principles will also be a key in my run short to ensure that all factors argon considered to ensure that a valid opinion is made. I will attack this subject from numerous angels showing both the permissible and impermissible forms of suicide.Thomas Aquinas argued that its unlawful to kill your ego for three reasons. 1 Because everything naturally tell aparts itself, the result being that everything naturally keeps itself in being () indeed suicide is contrary to the inclination of nature, and to charity whereby every musical composition should wonder himself. Hence suicide is () contrary to natural law and to charity, 2 becaus e () every man is part of the community, and so such, he belongs to the community. Hence by killing him he injures his community (). 3 Because life is Gods gift to man and is subject to his power () on that pointfrom whoever takes his own life, sins against God For it belongs to God alone to pronounce sentence of death and life.(T.Beauchamp, Suicide, In T.Regan(ed.),Matters of Life and Death (New York (etc,)McGraw-Hill, 3rd Edition, 1993).p.87.)Hume reply Some lives are not worth keeping. Given our natural horror against death, people but commit suicide if their lives are no yearner worth keeping. Our occupation to preserve life (including our own) only applies to life which is worth keeping. The moral immenseness of natural inclination to self perpetuation only extends to a life which is worth keeping. Therefore, suicide is not an act contrary to self love and self perpetuation. It is not always true that by killing oneself one injures the community for example, a) a person do es not make any part to the community or is not living in the community, example a hermit. b) a person who is an actual burden on society or whose death anyway is a benefit to others or just a community, Examples, illness requiring massive treatment, soldiers sacrificing for their comrades or fighting an evil regime. Similarly even if one contributes to the community suicide only withdraws its contribution it does not flat harm the society therefore withdrawing ones contribution is sometimes permissible. Humes Objection about ownership is either god determines all our choices or we determine them ourselves, if god determines our choices, then our choice to commit suicide cannot be against his will and hence cannot be violation of his right to choose. If God granted us self determination then out choice to commit suicide can also not be against his will. Therefore committing suicide is not to defective God.Hence we are back to the first argument as the hazard from which hume is trying to figure is different. Committing suicide might be wronging God in different sense namely by failing to respect his moral commands, which is also not to commit suicide.Consequentiality and deontological theoriesThe deontological theories are based around Morality. They center on the duties and rights of the individual or situation. One has moral duties to ones self not to harm or end life. yet if an individual no longer wishes to continue due to external factors or they no longer feel lifes beneficial to ones self then they would desire to die. except the deontologist would refuse this indicate upon a number of factors. The first being that the individual may not be in the perfect frame of mind at the time, therefore may make an impulsive choice which they may have regretted. However it could be argued that the individual has the best judgment of whether their life is worth lifting at the time compared to any other living mover. Secondly as agent we also cannot predict the future. This means that the individuals path of life could not be foreseen, dismissing the knowledge that that person may go on to presuppose, find the bring around for aids, benefiting the whole community, or the opposite, he may put a beetle off on others quality of life by becoming say a drug dealer, bringing a load of negative externalities to the community. If so the deontologist would say that it is not permissible to for the agent to commit suicide.Consequentiality looks at situations from another angle. They stress upon what actually happens and the utilitarianism theory that people should aim for the greatest overall avail. An individual could save millions of lifes if he self giftd. The consequentiality would argue that the man should self sacrifice in order to save millions of lives. This is due to the man only being one life against millions, whereas the deontologist would say no the man has the right to his life and the millions would die and this is what is m orally right. However such jobs and hobbies such as the multitude and skydiving mean that the individual is put their life at risk, therefore should the individual be allowed to carry out such activities as they may be seen as morally wrong as one is putting ones life at risk, but for the consequentiality there is greater pleasure, utility in the long run therefore making it permissible for them to do so. alone in all Suicide is a complicated issue, as there is not only moral argument but many other theories and cerebrates which also must be taken into consideration. Deontologist do not believe that an agent committing suicide is permissible as it is morally wrong to oneself, others and god.However the consequentiality believes that it is morally permissible to end ones life if it has a greater utility to others. I believe suicide is moral permissible as in such cases as the army and fire-fighters who self sacrifice for others. It may all come down to principle, can suicide ever be all morally permissible. We have duties to ourselves to self preserve, if we do not then we may not be acting morally therefore it is not morally permissible. Are al lives worth keeping or is it permissible in some ways to allow some people to die. Do we as agent who cannot see the future ever have the skills to decide? It is all on the individuals perception and there are extremes and complications of every matter of suicide.