Non-Dominant Voices on Difference and Diversity :: Multiculturalism Cultural Culture Politics Essays

Non-Dominant Voices on Difference and DiversityChapter one of Multiculturalism from the Margins Non-Dominant Voices on Difference and Diversity is Social Movements and the Politics of Difference by Cheryl Zarlenga Kerchis and glad Marion Young. This chapter examines the root of assimilation versus toleration of company differences. The chapter begins by explaining the historical acceptance of assimilation especially in the United States with its ideals of the Ameri quarter melting pot. However, as Kerchis and Young explained each sociable group evolved and eventually began to embrace the idea of a politics of difference. Although assimilation is still often part of insurance and accessible practice in the United States, Kerchis and Young point forth that this idea oppresses the socially disadvantaged group in three infract ways. First, assimilation oppresses socially disadvantaged groups because in trying to assimilate the socially disadvantaged group is always playing a game of catch up. Secondly, assimilation suggests that one goal is the right one. Lastly, members of the socially disadvantaged group can end up feeling abnormal or deviant. On the other hand, the idea of politics of difference allows members of an oppressed group to keep on and be proud of their identity(Harris, 1995, p.11). Also, the politics of difference allows the disadvantaged social groups to accept their differences and not try and adjust their culture to the more prevailing culture. Therefore, there is not a sense of a correct culture versus a less desirable one. Politics of difference also allows caller to view the dominant culture in a critical light, which can lead to necessary changes. Lastly, politics of difference embraces the concept of individualism, which American ordination has always held in high esteem.The author suggests that Our nation should strive for social justice in its political and social institutions. (Harris, 1995, p. 16). Just an informal review ar ticle of the political or judicial establishment reveals that social justice has not been accomplished. Most Americans agree that the justice system strongly favors the dominant culture. American politicians ar certainly not a diverse group of people. In education, the changes have been more strident. I work in a work partition that is primarily Hispanic. More and more administrators who are Hispanic are being hired. However, primarily white men hold the top district positions. The author next discusses the disadvantage women of child bearing years introduce in the work force. This is certainly an issue that I have experience personally.