'Overpopulation: Earth’s Destruction\r'

'Amanda Broxton Instructor Sabel Composition II drive and Effect Es tell May 28th, 2009 all oerpopulation: worldly concern’s Destruction Can you take c ar it? On unmatched side of the world, in the middle of nowhere, a potentially gorgeous child is just skin and swot; on the early(a) side, some other fleshly that sight not be re reard has gone(a) dead. whateverwhere on that point is a woman washing her few belongings in a dirty, polluted river. These and many other events like them are taking place all everyplace the world. The fuck off?\r\nOver popularization, on which has been the root of many problems and is caused by many others, merely do not worry on that point might be some take to in fixation it. Due to over popularization, one of body politic’s potential destruction is caused by over-production of the land. From more and more animals going extinct that stand not be replaced because thither isn’t room for them to live on. likewi se because of this, there is not enough viands and clean wet for serviceman and animals alike. Plus, sympathetics are not conserving resources as they should and are taking prime land to gage more and more people on. Environmentalists arrest long been concerned about the resources menace by rapidly growing human populations, focusing on phenomenon such as deforestation, desertification, air pollution and global warming. simply the worst-case scenario for people experiencing overpopulation, according to Lawrence Smith, president of the roughhewnwealth Institute, is a lack of fresh, clean water. â€Å"If the water goes, the species goes,” he said. ’(Hoevel, 2008, para. 9). Equally important is the incident that this is all caused by us world sapiens looking for a cave in life historystyle.\r\nWe now direct new medicines and technologies to attend to us live longer by healing every little social function that might be wrong with us. Some of those things w ere introduced by Mother Nature to belt down us off to keep everything equal. We in like manner assume higher birth range produced by more people having fitter births and multiple births. Furthermore, these children are living through and through earlier childhood killing diseases with the said(prenominal) medicines and technologies. ‘Until recently, birth rate and death order were about the same, keeping the population stable. battalion had many children, only a giant number of them died before age five.\r\nDuring the industrial Revolution, a period of history in Europe and North America where there were great advances in science and technology, the winner in reducing death rates was attributable to several factors: (1) in-creases in regimen production and distribution, (2) improvement in humans health (water and sanitation), and (3) medical technology (vaccines and antibiotics), along with gains in education and standards of living in spite of appearance many dev eloping nations. Without these attributes present in many childrens lives, they could not have survived common diseases like measles or the flu.\r\n mint were able to fight and cure plaguey germs that once killed them. ’(Kinder, 2009, para. 10). Not to worry though, there are some ways that this discrimination maybe reversed. They may not be what many people would approve of, but at least they are ideas of what we could do. That this one for instance, at the end of each month we would tally all the births. Then select at random from those people that are on death-row or even in prison or jail for life for longer then ten years, would have the honor of helping with the equalization of the birth-to-death ratio.\r\nIf postcode else, by and by a few years, this should deter hard crime. Each country and/or state would be responsible for The equalization Program. There is besides the idea of reinstating the both birth policy (China had this policy at one time) with a few ‘ pocketable’ adjustments. One being that right after the second birth there would be a mandatory sterilization of the bring and father, and any other men over fifty years of age would also have to be sterilization.\r\nThose that wanted another child would then have to marry those children that unfortunately don’t have a home. In conclusion, sure over popularization has many causes and it may cause many problems, but at least there are some solutions that can be looked at. I did not say that many people would like them but they’re there. In the end, I hope that things can be equaled out so that we do not have to fix up such a strain on our one and only earth. If we destroy it, there is not another one that we can start over on. Work cited\r\n'